Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
Ron Paul should run as an independent.

In reference to: Liberty Forums
Images and movies:

Click on a thumbnail to view it full size.

Click to view
Cruxes...
Insufficient information so far. Help explore this issue by adding responses (either in support or against).

Points

5
Boost
Report

Feb 01 2008

magnuslee avatar

magnuslee

Sites


Support 1
Boost
Magnify Report
2

Feb 01

2008

magnuslee avatar magnuslee

Expand
He will not get the republican nomination, so he can at least use the publicity garnered from that to propel his own campaign.

Counterarguments
Boost
Magnify Report
4

Feb 01

2008

Default Avatar randal

Point
Again, if we split up our own base, we arnt going to win at all. The idea that we should give up the white house for a little media time is STUPID!

Support 2
Boost
Magnify Report
1

Feb 01

2008

Default Avatar Firestalker5

Expand
I agree, but only if he loses the nomination. Not before.

Representation

Represented Sites:

Represented Communities:

Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
< We're here now:
Ron Paul should run as an independent.
Recent Activity
I agree, but only if he loses the nomination... [debate]
Most likely Paul will get few votes in the e... [debate]
well actually we have two other parties (the... [debate]