Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
It was a good decision that Pluto not be considered a planet

Cruxes...
Insufficient information so far. Help explore this issue by adding responses (either in support or against).

Points

1
Boost
Report

May 18 2007

nobody2 avatar

nobody2

Communities

Default Avatar Default Avatar Default Avatar

Sites


Support 1
Boost
Magnify Report
1

Dec 06

2007

Default Avatar csween

Expand
yes it doesn't fit into the current classification system of planets.

Counterarguments
Boost
Magnify Report
1

Mar 04

2008

Default Avatar fbhvjshln

Point
That's not exactly true. They don't fit all of the characteristics a planet does. Pluto may be small, but it is a planet nonetheless.

Representation

Represented Sites:

Represented Communities:

Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
< We're here now:
It was a good decision that Pluto not be considered a planet
Recent Activity
That's not exactly true. They don't fit all... [debate]
Pluto is a planet, but they're saying it's n... [debate]
including Pluto in the definition of planet ... [debate]