|
| New here? Jump in... | X |
Click the links below any post to see top
Supports
, Counterarguments
, and Comments
to it.
| Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. |
|
Click
Add Response
beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
|
|
Assertion:
I agree those plans are a bust, but that's b/c it doesn't support all. A nat'l plan could cover those who are denied, those who can't afford, and those who are underinsured.
Cruxes...
Insufficient information so far. Help explore this issue by adding responses (either in support or against).
Points
2
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.Feb 28 2008
fbwrzb3eh
Sites
Representation
Represented Sites:
Represented Communities:
Challenged / Invited
Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.
Share
Context
2 levels up:
1 level up:
< We're here now:
I agree those plans are a bust, but that's b/c it doesn't support all. A nat'...
Recent Activity
Thanks for stopping by! Don't worry about ge... [converse]
Hey Brendan, I finally popped over to check ... [converse]
yes, the 2 have a lot of similarities [converse]
Thus insurers would offer more generous plan... [debate]
Insurers would have a gov't plan to compete ... [debate]
Consider healthcare a seller's market. Healt... [debate]