Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
The all-or-nothing nature of the EC essentially disenfranchises voters who support the candidate who loses within their state.

Cruxes...
The top counterargument is, "The all-or-nothing nature is not required by the constitution, and two states do not use it. "
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!

Points

3
Boost
Report

Dec 13 2007

Default Avatar

brendanm98

Communities

Swords Crossed avatar

Sites


Representation

Represented Sites:

Represented Communities:

Swords Crossed avatar
Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
1 level up:
< We're here now:
The all-or-nothing nature of the EC essentially disenfranchises voters who su...
Recent Activity
interesting [converse]
good point [converse]
if someone wants to debate it, get in touch [converse]
Note the first sentence of the Preamble to t... [debate]
A longer example of what Pico means here und... [debate]
This is the principle of all citizens being ... [debate]