Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
The all-or-nothing nature is not required by the constitution, and two states do not use it.

Cruxes...
Insufficient information so far. Help explore this issue by adding responses (either in support or against).

Points

12
Boost
Report

Dec 13 2007

Default Avatar

eeyn524

Sites

www.theforvm.org

Support 1
Boost
Magnify Report
2

Dec 13

2007

Default Avatar brendanm98

Swords Crossed avatar
Expand
Other states are also considered altering their EC system, as was proposed recently in CA.

Representation

Represented Sites:

Represented Communities:

Swords Crossed avatar
Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
2 levels up:
1 level up:
< We're here now:
The all-or-nothing nature is not required by the constitution, and two states...
Recent Activity
interesting [converse]
good point [converse]
if someone wants to debate it, get in touch [converse]
Note the first sentence of the Preamble to t... [debate]
A longer example of what Pico means here und... [debate]
This is the principle of all citizens being ... [debate]