Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
Both Edwards' and Obama's campaigns rely heavily on grassroots, activist support. Edwards supporters will find Obama a better fit for that kind of politics.

Cruxes...
The top counterargument is, "Obama may benefit from activist support, but both Obama and Clinton rely heavily on donations and big money"
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!

Points

11
Boost
Report

Jan 31 2008

pico avatar

pico

Communities

Swords Crossed avatar

Sites


Support 1
Boost
Magnify Report
6

Jan 31

2008

Default Avatar brendanm98

Swords Crossed avatar
Expand
Article about Obama's ground game backs up your point
[blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/29/obamas_ground_game_advantage.html...]
.

Representation

Represented Sites:

Represented Communities:

Swords Crossed avatar
Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
1 level up:
< We're here now:
Both Edwards' and Obama's campaigns rely heavily on grassroots, activist supp...
Recent Activity
Plus Obama just scored the United Healthcare... [converse]
Perhaps a more telling poll, this from yeste... [converse]
just saw this: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytime... [converse]
Edwards supporters should only support Obama... [debate]
Yes I read that on the news. [debate]
"outside Wash."what does that mean? he's bac... [debate]