|
| New here? Jump in... | X |
Click the links below any post to see top
Supports
, Counterarguments
, and Comments
to it.
| Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. |
|
Click
Add Response
beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
|
|
Assertion:
The Democratic party should indeed have nominated Sen. Obama over Sen. Clinton.
Essay and/or background: Let's a have a nice debate with reasons and evidence. Try not to duplicate things people have already written. Respond to posts you disagree with and support or give points to things you agree with.
Images and movies:
Click on a thumbnail to view it full size.
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "Obama has better judgment to deal with the unexpected situations a President will have to deal with."
[Jump]
The top counterargument is, "Clinton would be a better president than Obama, from day one."
[Jump]
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!
Points
126
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.Feb 06 2008
nobody1
Communities
Sites
Counterargument 1
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
12
Feb 13
2008
nobody3
Clinton would be a better president than Obama, from day one.
Counterargument 2
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
6
Feb 13
2008
appu
Clinton has more experience than Obama and this is important
Counterargument 3
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
5
Feb 13
2008
appu
It would be a big step to have a female nominee.
Representation
Represented Sites:
Represented Communities:
Challenged / Invited
Communities Invited to Debate:
Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.
Share
Context
< We're here now:
The Democratic party should indeed have nominated Sen. Obama over Sen. Clinton.