Wikipedia should adopt an inclusionist philosophy when it comes to accepting new articles
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "If the editorial staff gets too strict, it goes against the open egalitarian nature that made Wikipedia so strong"
The top counterargument is, "Wikipedia search and disambiguation is reaching a limit. If we have too many articles with similar content, you won't be able to sift through the official and unofficial versions."
Wikipedia search and disambiguation is reaching a limit. If we have too many articles with similar content, you won't be able to sift through the official and unofficial versions.
This isn't a debate on whether two articles of similar content should be merged; it concerns the entire deletion of content deemed "trivial" by the site's most active members.