Cruxlux
New here? Jump in... X
Click the links below any post to see top , , and to it.
Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. Boost
Click beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
Live: Conversation about this topic
Invite someone to this debate by username, group, or email address:
Assertion:
Foreign companies should withdraw their sponsorship of the 2008 Beijing olympics

Images and movies:

Click on a thumbnail to view it full size.

Click to view
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "By withdrawing sponsorship, private enterprise can send a message faster than governments that they will not tolerate the human rights abuse."
The top counterargument is, "Boycotting the games will probably only hurt the athletes who want to compete and not force China to democratize"
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!

Points

41
Boost
Report

Mar 24 2008

Default Avatar

moby

Sites


Counterargument 1
Boost
Magnify Report
41

Mar 24

2008

tarheel avatar tarheel

Expand
Boycotting the games will probably only hurt the athletes who want to compete and not force China to democratize

Counterarguments
Boost
Magnify Report
18

Mar 25

2008

Default Avatar moby

Point
Athletes are also interested in boycotting the games, not just for human rights violations but also for pollution of Beijing

Boost
Magnify Report
5

May 09

2008

appu avatar appu

Point
A corporate boycott of the Olympics would not really impact the athletes.

Counterargument 2
Boost
Magnify Report
34

Mar 24

2008

Default Avatar stjerome

Expand
Sports and politics should be separate.

Counterargument 3
Boost
Magnify Report
30

Mar 25

2008

mccainin08 avatar mccainin08

www.myblogspot.com
Expand
The Olympics has already put pressure on Beijing to allow 3,000 U.N. peacekeepers into Darfur. Although action has been slower than expected, it has had a positive effect.

Counterarguments
Boost
Magnify Report
15

Mar 25

2008

Default Avatar moby

Point
Such being said, the Khartoum government trades heavily with China and even uses Chinese weapons to commit their atrocities.

A fresh counterargument (Boost this post if you think it is a good argument, even if you don't agree with it.)
Boost
Magnify Report
25

Mar 24

2008

maggie84 avatar maggie84

Expand
There is too much money at stake, and companies should not risk their bottom line if they have already invested heavily for 2008. The economy is shaky as it is...

Representation

Represented Sites:

www.myblogspot.com

Represented Communities:

Default Avatar
Challenged / Invited

Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.

Share
and/or
Del.icio.us Digg Share on Facebook Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon
Context
< We're here now:
Foreign companies should withdraw their sponsorship of the 2008 Beijing olympics
Recent Activity
we'll see how this all works out soon enough. [converse]
Paulson's huge plan shows how weak the econo... [debate]
Companies withdrawing sponsorship of the Oly... [debate]
A corporate boycott of the Olympics would no... [debate]