|
| New here? Jump in... | X |
Click the links below any post to see top
Supports
, Counterarguments
, and Comments
to it.
| Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. |
|
Click
Add Response
beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
|
|
Assertion:
The U.S. should start constructing many more nuclear power plants.
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "Switching to nuclear power will help combat global climate change."
[Jump]
The top counterargument is, "nuclear power plants are dangerous. We should remember our lesson from Chernobyl."
[Jump]
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!
Points
21
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.May 19 2008
ianmc1
Sites
Counterargument 1
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
24
May 19
2008
lb49er
nuclear power plants are dangerous. We should remember our lesson from Chernobyl.
Counterarguments
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
16
May 19
2008
bearsman
nuclear technology has gotten much safer in the time since chernobyl
Counterargument 2
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
16
May 19
2008
mountain77
We do not have anywhere to safely keep the radioactive waste of the plants.
Counterargument 3
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
5
Sep 21
2008
mgunn
Nuclear plants are an expensive form of power when compared to natural gas and coal. Nuclear plants will only be built with liability caps and massive govt. massive subsidies.
Representation
Represented Sites:
Represented Communities:
Challenged / Invited
Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.
Share
Context
< We're here now:
The U.S. should start constructing many more nuclear power plants.