Essay and/or background: Welcome to the first formal debate hosted by Swords Crossed and open to multi-blog participation! We will be discussing the pros and cons of the Electoral College. We have created a skeleton framework for the debate and now you can add arguments, comment, and give points on any aspect of the topic of interest to you. We are also linking all essays written today on this topic at SC, so let us know in comments at SC of anything you write.
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "The EC enshrines disproportionate representation because votes cast in less populous states have a relatively greater impact. "
It's "disproportionate" in the opposite direction (unfair to small states) if you consider small states as equally sovereign to big ones. Population isn't all that matters.
This is true, but why assume that proportionate representation is the objective? Note the job title: President of the United States, not President of the American People.
by that logic, anyone in the country who supports the losing candidate is "disenfranchised." Whatever the system, the presidency is ultimately all or nothing as 1 person must win.