|
| New here? Jump in... | X |
Click the links below any post to see top
Supports
, Counterarguments
, and Comments
to it.
| Boost posts you think are good. This will increase their scores and help them move up. |
|
Click
Add Response
beneath any post to join the debate on it yourself and shed more light.
Spread the word and invite friends or groups—to get support, to challenge and convince, or just to share.
|
|
Assertion:
Wikipedia should adopt an inclusionist philosophy when it comes to accepting new articles
Cruxes...
The top point in support right now is, "If the editorial staff gets too strict, it goes against the open egalitarian nature that made Wikipedia so strong"
[Jump]
The top counterargument is, "Wikipedia search and disambiguation is reaching a limit. If we have too many articles with similar content, you won't be able to sift through the official and unofficial versions."
[Jump]
To view all the other arguments on both sides, and delve into the responses to them, just scroll down!
Points
6
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.Mar 13 2008
joey17
Sites
Support 1
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
9
Mar 13
2008
rodrigoo
If the editorial staff gets too strict, it goes against the open egalitarian nature that made Wikipedia so strong
Support 2
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
7
Mar 13
2008
misterex
Wikipedia is not paper. There is enough space to include all the articles, so why not.
Support 3
0 people have reported this post.
To report it, login first.
7
Mar 13
2008
misterex
If an article contains facts, no matter how minute or trivial, it should be considered part of the human knowledge base, so it deserves a place in the Wikipedia database.
Representation
Represented Sites:
Represented Communities:
Challenged / Invited
Invite more people/groups using the field at the top of this page.
Share
Context
< We're here now:
Wikipedia should adopt an inclusionist philosophy when it comes to accepting ...